On the floor, the assassination of 1 man in 1963 and the homicide of hundreds in 2001 could not appear to have a lot in frequent. Nevertheless, writer Peter Scott claims that the 2 incidents in US historical past are linked by “deep politics”. In his e-book “The Battle Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11 and the Deep Politics of Battle” he describes “deep politics” as “sustained patterns of collusion” underlying main occasions.
They don’t seem to be essentially the plans of 1 conspiring group, however subtly formed by the desire of individuals in energy over time, he provides.
Scott makes a number of key claims concerning the elements that hyperlink the 2 stunning occasions.
Firstly, he notes that for each moments, key senior members of presidency had been in a foreign country.
He additionally attracts consideration to insider purchases within the inventory markets – for Scott, this implies “particular information” of what was to return.
Was JFK’s assassination much like 9/11?
JFK was elected US President in 1960
Each occasions had been gateways to already supposed wars
Similarities additionally centre across the identities of the culprits behind each crimes.
The suspected shooter of JFK, Lee Harvey Oswald, was shortly recognized, however utilizing outdated info on file that didn’t match what Oswald truly appeared like on the time. –
For Scott this might point out that Oswald was not picked up from eye-witness accounts, however pre-selected because the “designated wrongdoer”.
Equally, an inventory of hijackers was issued on 9/11, 4 minutes earlier than Flight United 93 got here down in Pennsylvania.
In keeping with Scott, investigators did this “drawing on pre-9/11 recordsdata”, displaying that intelligence businesses “knew what was coming”.
In 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald emerged as a “lone deranged gunman who acted alone,” a proven fact that some nonetheless query.
Scott factors to occasions that straight preceded the 2001 assaults, when the US authorities used the identical language round a terrorist incident straight linked to the 9/11 hijackers, regardless of clear proof on the contrary.
In 1990, El Sayyid Nosair, who was educated by 9/11 hijacker Ali Mohamed, was pronounced to be a “deranged gunman” who “acted alone” by police within the homicide of Meir Kahane, the founding father of the Jewish Defence League.
This was regardless of coaching manuals, bomb-making tools and different proof that “may have been used to convict” Mohamed, says Scott.
9/11 was one of the horrific terror assaults in historical past
For Scott, this implies that the lone-gunman narrative is a software utilized by the US “to guard somebody or one thing else”.
He additionally says that prior investigations into the eventual culprits of each acts was “impeded”.
Oswald “was inexplicably taken off the FBI’s watch listing” in 1963, when he ought to have been a candidate for elevated surveillance, based on Scott.
In distinction, the “CIA failed to inform the FBI for months” when two of the 9/1 terrorist arrived within the US in 2000, in a sample of “withholding info”.
One of the commented-on elements in each occasions are the foremost wars that adopted.
Lyndon Johnson changed JFK within the White Home after his tragic loss of life
After JFK’s loss of life, American navy involvement in Asia was upped, resulting in the Vietnam struggle.
Equally, the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq was spearheaded by the US very shortly after 9/11.
Scott sees them each as “gateways to already supposed wars”.
The supposed consequence, he says, is to engineer a state of “everlasting struggle” – and a state of perpetual warfare offers a “everlasting justification for curbing liberties”.